Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 27% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8320 - 564 vs 445 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than FX-8320 - $60.86 vs $91.4
- Up to 48% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8320 - $0.12 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
564
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |