Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2171 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $74.59 vs $506.05
- Up to 83% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.53 vs $3.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8320 - 181 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.1/FPS
17%
Price, €
€561.72
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €561.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |