Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $69.47 vs $424.08
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 188% better in FIFA 23 than FX-8320 - 271 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Buy for €470.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |