Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $47.02 vs $248.6
- Up to 79% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $0.35 vs $1.65 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8320 - 167 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €52.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.65/FPS
21%
Price, €
€275.95
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €275.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |