Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 2828 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $69.47 vs $131.6
- Up to 29% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $0.55 vs $0.78 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 34% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8320 - 188 vs 140 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
140
74.46808510638297%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
70.51282051282051%
Price, €
€146.08
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |