Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $127.96 vs $152.07
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 94% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8320 - 171 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 39% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8320 - $0.99 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12075 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€168.8
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €168.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |