Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1938 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 8% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-8320 - 198 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than FX-8320 - $95.05 vs $127.96
- Up to 31% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than FX-8320 - $0.53 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |