Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8300 is 415 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G630 - 115 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 67% cheaper than FX-8300 - $27.41 vs $81.91
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8300 - $0.27 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
114
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |