Buy on Amazon
€86.08
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $77.55 vs $175.48
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 305% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than FX-8300 - 162 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 44% better value when playing Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than FX-8300 - $1.2 vs $2.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
40
24.691358024691358%
Value, €/FPS
€2.15/FPS
55.81395348837209%
Price, €
€86.08
100%
AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition FX-8300 3.3 GHz with 4.2 GHz Turbo Octa core Processor (FD8300WMHKBOX)
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€194.78
44%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €194.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.