Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $77.55 vs $304.01
- Up to 61% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10900 - $0.66 vs $1.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 52% better in War Thunder than FX-8300 - 198 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
130
65.65656565656566%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
38.82352941176471%
Price, €
€337.45
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €337.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |