Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2834 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $81.91 vs $204.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10850K - $0.59 vs $1.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8300 - 172 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
44%
Price, €
€226.44
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |