Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1707 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $77.55 vs $328.3
- Up to 72% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-7820X - $0.96 vs $3.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8300 - 107 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7167 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.41/FPS
28%
Price, €
€364.41
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €364.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |