Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 313 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than FX-8300 - 195 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than FX-8300 - $30.07 vs $81.91
- Up to 65% better value when playing Valheim than FX-8300 - $0.17 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |