Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7940HS is 3747 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Performs up to 28% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-8300 - 148 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
116
78.37837837837837%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
Yes | Overclockable | No |