Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $73.12 vs $296.13
- Up to 71% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $0.46 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 15% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-8300 - 204 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
28%
Price, €
€328.7
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €328.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |