Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4560 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4560 is 1910 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 8% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8150 - 150 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than FX-8150 - $50.14 vs $59.97
- Up to 23% better value when playing Dirt 5 than FX-8150 - $0.37 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
139
92.66666666666666%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
77.08333333333334%
Price, €
€66.57
83%
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1582 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €55.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1586 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |