Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $59.97 vs $307.06
- Up to 77% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-13900F - $0.35 vs $1.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in Valheim than FX-8150 - 226 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 32 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
189
83.6283185840708%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
23.178807947019866%
Price, €
€340.84
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €340.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |