Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $46.81 vs $197.42
- Up to 65% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-11900 - $0.34 vs $0.96 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 49% better in Rust than FX-8150 - 228 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €51.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
228
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
35%
Price, €
€219.14
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |