Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $59.97 vs $199.95
- Up to 65% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i7-13700K - $0.44 vs $1.25 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 16% better in Halo Infinite than FX-8150 - 177 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
152
85.87570621468926%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
35.199999999999996%
Price, €
€221.95
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €221.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |