Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $46.81 vs $160.13
- Up to 45% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-10700F - $0.56 vs $1.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 89% better in FIFA 23 than FX-8150 - 176 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €51.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
55%
Price, €
€177.74
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |