Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 327 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $46.81 vs $57.77
- Up to 19% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-3220 - $0.22 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than FX-8150 - 237 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €51.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17506 minutes ago
Buy for €64.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17506 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |