Buy on Amazon
€51.96
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $134
Availability
MSRP in USD: $134
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $46.81 vs $101.62
- Up to 45% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-13100 - $0.47 vs $0.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than FX-8150 - 131 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for €51.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13441 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-13100 Desktop Processor 4 cores (4 P-cores + 0 E-cores) 12MB Cache, up to 4.5 GHz
Buy for €112.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i3-13100
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.