Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 3205 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $59.97 vs $131.6
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8150 - 178 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |