Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2381 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $46.81 vs $127.96
- Up to 63% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.1 vs $0.27 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than FX-8150 - 528 vs 504 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €51.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
528
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
37%
Price, €
€142.04
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |