Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8300 is 377 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 23% cheaper than FX-8300 - $59.97 vs $77.55
- Up to 21% better value when playing Minecraft than FX-8300 - $0.11 vs $0.14 per FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than FX-8150 - 599 vs 597 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4280 minutes ago
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4281 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |