Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $57.05 vs $318.06
- Up to 49% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-13900F - $0.69 vs $1.34 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 186% better in FIFA 23 than FX-8120 - 263 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 32 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.34/FPS
51%
Price, €
€353.05
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |