Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3211 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $57.05 vs $204.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing New World than Core i9-10850K - $0.65 vs $1.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 24% better in New World than FX-8120 - 122 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.86/FPS
34%
Price, €
€226.44
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |