Buy on Amazon
€63.32
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1358 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $57.05 vs $87.75
- Up to 32% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6700 - $0.42 vs $0.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8120 - 158 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 95W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Intel Boxed Core I7-6700 FC-LGA14C 3.40 GHz 8 M Processor Cache 4 LGA 1151 BX80662I76700
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i7-6700
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.