Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $57.05 vs $270.23
- Up to 74% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-14700F - $0.34 vs $1.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 20% better in Valheim than FX-8120 - 227 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 28 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
25%
Price, €
€299.95
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |