Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4460 outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4460 is 942 days newer than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 4% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-8120 - 113 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than FX-8120 - $46.82 vs $57.05
- Up to 21% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-8120 - $0.46 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €51.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |