Buy on Amazon
€63.32
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 327 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-3330 - $57.05 vs $77.87
- Up to 23% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-3330 - $0.49 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 5% better in War Thunder than FX-8120 - 135 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 95W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-3330 3 GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I53330
Buy for €86.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.