Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 4388 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $57.05 vs $143.31
- Up to 51% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-14600KF - $0.34 vs $0.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Valheim than FX-8120 - 227 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 20 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
189
83.25991189427313%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
48.57142857142858%
Price, €
€159.07
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €159.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 342 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |