Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $29.24 vs $102.37
- Up to 69% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-11600 - $0.15 vs $0.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 11% better in Fortnite than FX-8120 - 236 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6364 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
31%
Price, €
€113.63
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6364 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |