Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $57.05 vs $86.28
- Up to 29% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-10600KF - $0.3 vs $0.42 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than FX-8120 - 229 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
71%
Price, €
€95.77
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €95.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |