Buy on Amazon
€63.32
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4350 outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4350 is 932 days newer than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Performs up to 6% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-8120 - 194 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than FX-8120 - $35.17 vs $57.05
- Up to 43% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than FX-8120 - $0.2 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 95W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Core i3-4350
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4350 Processor (4M Cache, 3.60 GHz) BX80646I34350
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i3-4350
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i3-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.