Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8120 is 233 days older than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Performs up to 0% better in Rocket League than Celeron G550 - 672 vs 670 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 37% cheaper than FX-8120 - $35.83 vs $57.05
- Up to 33% better value when playing Rocket League than FX-8120 - $0.06 vs $0.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
670
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |