Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2365 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 41% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $29.24 vs $49.74
- Up to 40% better value when playing Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves than Celeron G4900 - $0.21 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves than FX-8120 - 158 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18583 minutes ago
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18583 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |