Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1968 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700X - $57.05 vs $142.59
- Up to 56% better value when playing New World than Ryzen 7 1700X - $0.65 vs $1.47 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 10% better in New World than FX-8120 - 108 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
98
90.74074074074075%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
108
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
44.21768707482994%
Price, €
€158.27
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |