Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 200GE outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2521 days newer than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than FX-8120 - 147 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than FX-8120 - $51.17 vs $57.05
- Up to 11% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-8120 - $0.39 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
144
97.95918367346938%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
88.63636363636364%
Price, €
€63.32
89%
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1799 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1805 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Zambezi | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |