Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 1208 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Pentium G6950 - 214 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 32% cheaper than FX-6350 - $27.41 vs $40.22
- Up to 33% better value when playing Death Stranding than FX-6350 - $0.14 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €44.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
212
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |