Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9800X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9800X is 1999 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - $73.11 vs $562.2
- Up to 86% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-9800X - $0.3 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6350 - 294 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
274
93.19727891156462%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5653 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
294
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
14.150943396226415%
Price, €
€624.04
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €624.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5658 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-9800X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |