Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1799 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $73.11 vs $145.5
- Up to 48% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i7-8700T - $0.32 vs $0.61 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 4% better in Dishonored 2 than FX-6350 - 265 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
255
96.22641509433963%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4091 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
265
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
52.459016393442624%
Price, €
€161.51
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |