Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 1708 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - $73.12 vs $146.23
- Up to 42% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-8700 - $0.45 vs $0.77 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 18% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-6350 - 211 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Buy for €162.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |