Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3537 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $73.11 vs $584.95
- Up to 83% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-13400F - $0.75 vs $4.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 37% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6350 - 148 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
108
72.97297297297297%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.39/FPS
17.084282460136677%
Price, €
€649.29
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €649.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |