Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 3193 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - $73.11 vs $201.51
- Up to 57% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-12600 - $0.73 vs $1.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 132 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
111
84.0909090909091%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33796 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
43.19526627218935%
Price, €
€223.68
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €223.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33804 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |