Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $73.11 vs $96.02
- Up to 21% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-10600K - $0.46 vs $0.58 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-6350 - 184 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
178
96.73913043478261%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
79.31034482758622%
Price, €
€106.58
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €106.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |