Buy on Amazon
€81.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2558 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6350 - 350 vs 319 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than FX-6350 - $73.09 vs $73.12
- Up to 8% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than FX-6350 - $0.23 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2595 minutes ago
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
350
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10400F (Base Clock: 2.90 GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2596 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.