Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1345 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 17% better in Rust than FX-6350 - 182 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than FX-6350 - $35.17 vs $40.22
- Up to 28% better value when playing Rust than FX-6350 - $0.21 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €44.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |