Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-6350 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-6350 is 1208 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-540.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i3-540 - 195 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i3-540 - $40.22 vs $43.86
- Up to 8% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i3-540 - $0.23 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €44.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |