Buy on Amazon
€81.15
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3172 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 9% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6350 - 298 vs 274 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than FX-6350 - $36.56 vs $73.11
- Up to 53% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6350 - $0.14 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
274
91.94630872483222%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
46.66666666666667%
Price, €
€81.15
50%
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
298
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G6900 Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) UHD Graphics 710 Alder Lake (OEM Tray Version) 46W - Reliable Performance for Home and Office
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.